sabotender-bailarina:

sabotender-bailarina:

sapphiccygnet:

warmsleepy:

moranion:

warmsleepy:

Bring back the phase of society where having your tiddies all the way out was fine but showing ankle flesh was scandalous

i know this is aiming at 17. and 18. and 19. century fashion, but i really wanna bring back those dresses that only basically start under the boobs, like that little number Minoan snake goddess figurine is wearing

that was actually what i was thinking of! ive been obsessed with that figure since i was her in a history book as a kid lmao 

 the ultimate look!!! 2 titties out 2 snakes in hand 

titties out, snakes up, she’s ready 2 go

ankles: covered

snakes: up

titties: out

I am forcibly removed from the historical narrative

Yup.

Notes for guys. (Because mansplaining to other men is sliiightly better than mansplaining to women.)

Minus the coverup culture boobs are still nice to look at. But if you’ve ever spent time at river or lake beaches in, for instance, British Columbia, you figure out pretty quickly that they’re nice in the same way ankles or eyes, hands or necks are.

Potentially arousing, sure, but only in the same way hands or mouths are.

Odd how handjobs and blowjobs are INCREDIBLY more common than boob fucking yet you never hear anyone (well, except Mike Pence and maybe Mike Huckabee) insisting women should cover their hands and mouths to keep from “distracting the male staff.”

Artificial scarcity creates value where none would otherwise exist.

This is not endorsing toplessness, ankle covering, or Minoan sartorial fashion.