Feature not a bug of having a Daddy. We’ll straighten out your top and say “there now, nothing to be ashamed of. I mean you were like that all night but now you’re allll covered up again.”
It will not occur to us that you might find any of that more embarrassing. Or won’t appear to.
Bring back the phase of society where having your tiddies all the way out was fine but showing ankle flesh was scandalous
i know this is aiming at 17. and 18. and 19. century fashion, but i really wanna bring back those dresses that only basically start under the boobs, like that little number Minoan snake goddess figurine is wearing
that was actually what i was thinking of! ive been obsessed with that figure since i was her in a history book as a kid lmao
the ultimate look!!! 2 titties out 2 snakes in hand
titties out, snakes up, she’s ready 2 go
ankles: covered
snakes: up
titties: out
I am forcibly removed from the historical narrative
Yup.
Notes for guys. (Because mansplaining to other men is sliiightly better than mansplaining to women.)
Minus the coverup culture boobs are still nice to look at. But if you’ve ever spent time at river or lake beaches in, for instance, British Columbia, you figure out pretty quickly that they’re nice in the same way ankles or eyes, hands or necks are.
Potentially arousing, sure, but only in the same way hands or mouths are.
Odd how handjobs and blowjobs are INCREDIBLY more common than boob fucking yet you never hear anyone (well, except Mike Pence and maybe Mike Huckabee) insisting women should cover their hands and mouths to keep from “distracting the male staff.”
Artificial scarcity creates value where none would otherwise exist.
This is not endorsing toplessness, ankle covering, or Minoan sartorial fashion.
Always going to help you study, for real. But when I see you’re rereading the same page cause you can’t focus and you’re too stubborn to take a break? There are other ways to help you study, aren’t there, glowworm?
