Try not to assume that “receptive” means “submissive”

Just going to point out that depending on how they’re shaped, people are going to demonstrate things like sexual aggression very differently, aren’t they?

Because, yeah, if you want something inside you you’re going to assert yourself differently, but no less emphatically, than if you had something you wanted to put inside.

“Receptive” ≠ “submissive.”

If you think otherwise then welcome to the social construction of gender. 🤷‍♂️

Note: not says (at all) that this clip is any kind of political statement – one can’t determine from the context what the intentions of the actor, any potential partners, the director of photography, etc. hand in mind.  But that’s sort of the point, isn’t it?  You can’t know simply based on the action.  You can only assume based on various social cues of dubious origin.