t34ch3r:

The best answer I’ve ever seen.

Ahahah.  Good answer!  If a couple of grams of hair more or less is really going to stop you from enjoying sex then… well… you can’t be too interested in sex to begin with, can you?

A better, more historical answer might have been “Ye God’s man!  If she’s abyle to bathe her nether regions with enough frequencie to avoid yon lice and fleas then be she not cleane enough to licke them?”

Because, seriously, in much of the world women and men shave below the neckline not to be Teh Sexay but to avoid Teh Rashes and Insect Bites!  It was common in the American pioneer days – those sod shanties and log cabins tended towards lice and fleas, and I promise you didn’t want to get the lye soap most people had to use anywhere near your naughty bits!  (Think about that next time you read Little House on the Prairie or watch John Wayne’s stubble-avoiding wide-stance swagger in old cowboy movies!)

As for porn creating unreal expectations, it’s worth mentioning that shaving was common enough in Victorian England that pornographers went out of their way to describe or depict women’s pubic hair in lurid, lust-filled detail.  The takeaway?  Yeah, it’s porn’s fault but hair or no hair it’s always been porn’s fault.

I mean, I get it.  If you’re too much of a wimp to kiss the back of your sweetie’s neck or behind her ear because you’re mortally terrified of hair then… well… I feel sorry for you but go for it.  Otherwise, it’s just not that giant a puzzle.