Posts Tagged ‘d/s lifestyle’
Dear random dude in my inbox,
you donât want a female dominant.
You want a woman you can yet again fetishize who will do everything that turns you on, no matter if it does anything for her, and who you donât have to have any respect for except the fake one when you want her to dom you.
Sincerely,
a domme whoâs tired of your sexist bullshit
Just going to put it out there that this is one of the reasons Iâm a little skeptical of the âthe Sub has the powerâ meme. Because it really quickly falls apart when you drop the (cough patriarchal/traditional cough) gendered assumption that Doms are always men and Subs are always women. Â
Note that gendered assumptions are so goddamned ingrained that people have to make up a whole ânother word for women Doms! (Because, face it, âDommeâ and âdominatrixâ are as knuckle-draggingly regressive as âdoctoress,â âaviatrix,â âmale nurse,â and âmanny-nanny.â)
But I digress. If âthe Sub has the powerâ thereâd be no problem with @playfully-sadisticâs, um, correspondent deciding he could âhave the powerâ her, would there?
In reality, though, D/S relationship are relationships! Each party brings 100% o the power to their power-exchanges. Each party gets to consent, to have boundaries, and to choose their partners and what they do for, to, and with them.
Donât get me wrong about âupside downâ topping/bottoming relationships! Iâve mentioned that a lot of bratty Subs and Littles are actually the tops in the relationship and their âlong sufferingâ Doms or Daddies are actually the subs. And unlike some people I see exactly zero anything wrong with the notion of âservice topsâ either. So Iâm not opposed in principle to long-term or weekend âdommesâ who cater to their âsubs,â nor do I object at all to âdominatrixesâ who depend on their ability perform specialty sex-work in order to get paid by their clients. As I say over and over, BDSM is an entire dictionary of kinks, and D/S alone contains a whole alphabet of possibilities.
That said, neither actual capital-D Doms (of any gender) nor capital-S Subs (ditto) seem to have much patience with randos messaging them with either
a) what theyâd like to do to them, or
b) what theyâd like to have done
Instead the tend to prefer first and ntroduction, then relationship, then sex. Why itâs almost as if Doms and Subs were normal human beings!
Note: itâs not like itâs only male Subs and Littles who make these sorts of presumptions. A surprising number of women seem to have similar notions.
Hello! Do you think a Dom has to continue to work to receive his subâs submission? Or once he has it, he doesnât need to do anything more?
A Dom needs to step up and re-earn the gift of their subâs submission every damn day. Just as a sub needs to step up and re-earn the gift of their Domâs Dominance every damn day.
You can look at it another way @anon ,
You have to get up everyday and work to keep their submission.
Itâs like love or respect. Once given, your job is to keep it.
And it is oh so easy to fritter away .
Anon, are you⊠serious?? I canât even. I just⊠I canât. Why on EARTH would ANY Dom (unless theyâre ignorant or an asshole) think they donât have to earn their partnerâs submission EACH AND EVERY DAY?? Their submission is NOT something that they owe you. Itâs something they GIFT you, IF you are worthy of it.
Domination is a verb not a noun.
For that matter Submission is also a verb.
Borrowed from the similar observation about marriage. Marriage isnât an event. Itâs a relationship – a continuous action and way to be in action towards each other.
Same with D/S. You canât Just Dominate or Submit once and call it a day.
This is one of those things a lot of newcomers to kink dont get right away. They go looking for people who brag that theyâre Doms, for instance. Or theyâll imagine that the woman in the ânaughty schoolgirlâ skirt and blouse will be the wildest.
And, eh, sometimes that even works out!
Sometimes.
Just gonna point out that itâs the Ravenclaws and Hufflepufs whoâll fool you.
Still waters run deep…
And sometimes pleasantly dark.
Hello, thank you very much for answering my question. I am still somewhat new to D/s. And only found out over the last couple of month, that I do like a certain type of pain. I can very much relate to that GIF. Hence my question. Thanks again :) Have a wonderful weekend!
Awesome! If I can just throw one more lesson out for general consumption it would be to clarify that D/S isnât the blanket kink under which all other kinks are some kind of subset. Â
For instance, D/Lg is often defined as âa subset of D/S.â And D/S is often defined as including punishment and administration of pain. Itâs also generally assumed that, for instance, if someone is a Little theyâre also a Sub, or if someoneâs a Dom theyâre also a Sadist. Â
Itâs also so universally assumed that Doms are men that people feel obliged to make up bullshit diminutives like âdommeâ or âdominatrixâ for Doms who are women, and correspondingly one of the most common adjectives for a man whoâs a Sub is âsissy!â But I digressâŠ
Iâve mentioned elsewhere that in a pure, idealized D/S relationship youâd expect to see exactly zero transgression, pain, or punishment. An ideal Dom and Sub would be in perfect agreement with clearly stated structures, rules, and goals. A perfect Dom would never consider enacting an unachievable rule nor would a perfect Sub ever consider falling short of 100% compliance! A clarifying word from the Dom would be all that was ever needed to make any change or correct any mistake.
Iâm tempted to say no such D/S relationships exist but in fact they probably do by the tens of thousands. We just never hear about them precisely because theyâre extraordinarily dull and outwardly vanilla.
But in general, only clinical fetishists manifest âpureâ kinks. So of course itâs often the case that D/S relationships include elements of bondage, discipline, and S&M. Same with any other kink or non-psychiatric fetish. Sadists and Masochists may use âweekendâ or âbedroomâ D/S as excuses for spankings. B&D fans might use pet play as an excuse for collars and leashes and cages.
And in my case as both a âsoftâ non-Dom Daddy and a cheerful Sadist my kinks donât really overlap at all, except possibly as a âgame timeâ or roleplaying activity, as in a Little coming over with a bag of clothes pins and saying âDaddy, look what I found!â
I mention all this not to diminish D/S but to defend it! One of the common themes among D/S types â sometimes called â24/7âł or âlifestyleâ D/S â is partners who present themselves as âreal Domsâ or âSubmissivesâ but only during sex, or only on weekends, or only in the first weeks of a new relationship. The problem being that not all tops are Doms, not by a long mile. Neither are all bottoms capital-S Submissive.
When everybody wanders around saying to themselves âI like to spank so I must be a Domâ or âI get off on being tied up so I must be a Subâ it just causes a lot of messy confusion, disappointment, and disillusionment.Â
Iâd like to see less of that unhappiness in the world in general and the world of kink in particular.
Anon, I donât doubt for a moment that when you said âI am still somewhat new to D/s. And only found out over the last couple of month, that I do like a certain type of painâ you mean youâve discovered youâre an authentic D/S Sub who also likes a certain type of pain. (Call it a major in Submission with a minor in Masochism.) Thereâs no reason on earth I might believe otherwise!
So instead of saying âbutâ I want to thank you for giving me an opportunity to clarify that not everyone else in kink âmajorsâ in D/S. Nor does casual vocabulary in kink make it very easy to distinguish the difference.
Thanks again. Iâm so glad youâre discovering new things about yourself. That makes me very happy!
Her foot broadcasts his kissâŠ.
Yes, this is D/s too.
No suit or lingerie required ????
Beautifully said! Itâs not how you look, itâs how you feel about each other. Not about toys or tools but how you respond to each other. Â
Help!! My sweet boy has recently found himself in a wheelchair due to an eletrical accident and has trouble getting alot sensation below the waist now, I need help. with finding high sensation ways to play.Please reblog to any dommes that may be able to help
Holy shit, I hope theyâre okay and feeling well. Iâm not well informed about this kind of thing so if there are any kinksters out there who can help, this domme and I would appreciate it a lot ????
Um… if someoneâs ârecently found themselves in a wheelchairâ then they and/or you should talk to their caregivers. If the ask is for real Iâm surprised they didnât bring it up with him! Â
One possibility is that his injury was really recent, in which case he may still be undergoing rehabilitative care. In that case itâs likely heâs still in the rehab protocol and they just havenât brought it up yet.
All nerve damage takes time to work itself out – thereâs an extraordinary amount of âreroutingâ that goes on, not to mention the actual process of healing tissue. If he was really injured recently then itâs even more important to check with his caregivers!
Meanwhile, though, you think heâs the first man in this situation? Think heâs the first one whoâs partnerâs freaked out about their future sex life together? Think doctors, physical therapists, occupational therapists, not to mention other paraplegics and their partners havenât put a lot of thought into this?
Google âsex for paraplegicsâ and youâll find tons of good stuff from all kinds of sources. Â
If the patient is a Sub or Masochist thatâs great, but Dom or no Dom, Sadist or no Sadist, the first step is to get their plumbing working at all again. Then start working kink back into things. And obviously check closely and repeatedly with their caregivers before getting up to anything involving impact play, wax, and (yeah, just donât) Violet Wands, etc.
Oh, and finally, since heâs almost certainly going to need continuing care from physical therapists and the like, heâs going to need to be extremely and repeatedly clear to his caregivers that heâs a consensual sexual masochist. Otherwise any bruising or damage caregivers see is going to get mandatory-reporting protocoled allll over the place.
I appreciate but disagree with the assertion because for some bottoms it is a role and it is a game and it is something you try. It is an item on your bucket list, and sometimes? Itâs not always 24/7, and thereâs not a damn thing wrong with that. Â
Sometimes though? Sometimes it really is who you are! Thatâs (literally!) awesome.
Another reason why I always capitalize the S in Submissive. Â Because some Subs? Â They donât just want to fuck around on the weekends, theyâre serious! Â
I’m a sub struggling with an eating disorder. Is it fair to want to call off rules around food for a few days while working through a relapse? I still want to keep to the rules even while they’re “off” because they keep me safe, but I don’t want to work through this episode alongside the stress of reporting meals (can be triggering) or fear of disappointing him.
Understandable, and rules arenât really appropriate when your ED flares up. What is appropriate is letting your Dom know, so they can be there for you. Not as your Dom, but as your lover and your rock. ED is pernicious, and the best approach for D types is empathy and support, not rules.
This is pretty important! Itâs a terrible idea to make up D/S or D/Lg rules involving psychological or biological problems. You canât fuck someone back to health and you canât kink them back to it either.
We constantly overload love and sex, thinking we can pile onto it more than it can bear. Same with kink. D/S is a kink, not a healthcare replacement.Â
May we have depictions of male subs with buzzcuts and beards. I feel a little excluded sometimes as a lot of subs are depicted as being quite feminine in appearance
This! Submission is a kink, not a gender!
Back in the 1950s and 1960s âcarrying a purseâ was a mainstream semaphore for homosexuality. It was just assumed that to be gay meant to be feminized. Â
But people in the 1950s and 1960s were viciously and willfully clueless, werenât they? They were so locked up in their constructions of heteronormativity they simply couldnât conceive of ordinary, normal, boringly-mainstream men being attracted to other equally ordinary men. So they had to make up stories about gay men really wanting to be women.
Nowadays weâre not as stupid about that. Sure, some gay men really do âcarry pursesâ the vast majority donât.  âGayâ â  âfeminineâ
A lot of people are still being viciously and willfully clueless about D/S. Theyâre still so locked up in their constructions of heteronormativity they canât conceive or ordinary, normal, boringly-mainstream Submissive men. And so they have to make up stories about all Submissive men really wanting to be women.
âSubmissiveâ â Â âfeminine.â
I haven’t had an orgasm in about two months. I’ve tried to bring it up to my husband but he gets annoyed with me when I try to meta talk or I bring it up after we “have sex”. He won’t let me invest in toys or listen to me when I say I didn’t get off. What should I do?
The facile answer would be to fire his ass. Youâve brought it up, had meta talks about it, and nada. But youâre married so itâs not that easy. Some guys are just lazy, self-absorbed assholes. Followers, any ideas for Anon here?
If he refuses to be responsible with ownership of your orgasms, take them back and do it yourself. He canât fire you either.
It really doesnât sound like this is a D/S âorgasm denialâ situation. Sounds more like heâs just not bothering to take responsibility.
Thing is, itâs only a kink if both your kinks are satisfied. And while âsatisfiedâ may include a Sub whoâs never allowed to have an orgasm if that makes them, thatâs clearly not the case here. Instead weâre talking about plain old hetero vanilla orgasm inequality.
Thatâs actually good news because while there might not be much D/S conversation about this thereâs tons of conversation about it in vanilla circles. Youâll find books, articles, YouTube videos, blog posts, memes, and Tweets that discuss this in depth.
Itâs ok to stop with the âmeta talkâ about D/S, drop the âsir,â and have a relationship talk.