Things Daddies should do for their Littles

daddystardust:

.I’m really over seeing all of the fake sickos out there labeling themselves as “Daddies”. It’s really dangerous and harmful to littles, who make themselves so vulnerable and impressionable.
These are the things REAL daddies do.
-say Goodnight/ Good Morning every single day
-Pick out or help pick out pajamas.
-Order for your little or help them decide and help them tell the server at restaurants.
-Buckle her in when you go for car rides/remind her to do so if you’re not there.
-Brush her hair
-Support all of her big space goals/ventures
-Play silly games with her.
– Make, or help her make, her meals when possible.
-Take her on adventures.
-Kiss her owies and her boo boo lip when she’s sad/hurt.
-Tie her shoes.
-Give her a chore chart, and stick to it!
-Turn on her favorite cartoons/Disney Movies.
-Remind her that she’s yours.
-Know all her stuffies’ names.
-Tuck her in at night.
-Read/tell her stories whenever she needs them.
-Open doors for her.
-Reach things stowed in high cabinets/shelves.
-Make sure all expectations and consequences are enumerated in RULES
-Color WITH her. Don’t just watch unless that’s what she asks for.
-Let her know when it’s naptime/bedtime (and don’t fall for the little voice/puppy dog eyes like me when she tries to get out of it).
-Baby her when she’s sick or depressed.
-Use your daddy voice.
-Bring her surprises.
-Help her get into little space when she’s having a hard day.
-Bathe her.
-Hold her hand in public places.
-Make a big deal about all her accomplishments, no matter how small.
-Refill her sippy cup.
-Call her adorable pet names (princess, babygirl, kitten, little one, etc.).
-Protect her against all things big and scary (and adulty).
-Support and encourage her participation in the dd/lg community.
-Administer punishments/provide discipline when necessary and appropriate (or for fun!).
-Give her princess parts special attention.
-Fuck her like no other.
-AFTERCARE AFTERCARE AFTERCARE
**Daddy is NOT just a title  used in the bedroom. 99% of being a REAL DD lies in taking on the caregiver role!!!**
DISCLAIMER: These apply for Mommies and Little Boys too.

None of us are perfect. Not all of us can achieve our goals. Including me. So I post these things not to hold you accountable but to help me be accountable.

“The universe is more likely to give you what you want if you ask for it than if you make it try and guess” — me.

princesskrissylou:

taylortheslut:

tumblr ‘Dom’ bingo! if you get a bingo, get the hell out of there.

😂

Sigh.  I’ve been… some of these.  I still say “mmm.”  I’m too wordy every to say only “hey.”  I have an equivalency degree in typos and grammatical errors.  I used to think I was a “nice guy.”

I read so many of these things and just think “there’s a lot of hurting cowboys out there.”  And it makes me think it’s a very bad idea to message anyone out of the blue if you’re horny,  even  especially if their blog is what’s made you horny.

And WTF anal without lube?

As a soft Daddy and even when I thought I was just a shitty Dom I had (and have) a really bad sense of what good “punishment” would be.  But since so many people like to give blowjobs and get spankings… well… yeah, that’s probably the kind of “punishments” I’d assign. (But again, soft Daddy = not actually punishing anyone.)

I can make an excellent case that safewords are actually kind of dangerous… but that’s not what the Bingo square is talking about, is it?

“One dick” poly isn’t really poly, is it?

But yeah, I see most of these things and just think how many guys out there (it’s mostly guys) who could get a clue if they just stopped and thought about it for a minute.  Ok, maybe a couple of days.  And yeah, I’m still unlearning things I’ve uncritically picked up over the years so it’s not like I’m anybody’s paragon of virtue either.

Just gonna put it out there that I appreciate Julie Andrews as much as the next person, but if we want to cut down on the number of Bingo “winners” out there somebody’s got to repeal that stupid “I am sixteen going on seventeen” song, and the entire ideology behind it that men automatically know more about sex (and life!) than women, that older people understand more than younger ones, etc.  

Because, man, the best way to become a good top (Dom, Daddy, Sadist, etc.) is from a more experienced bottom!  An unfortunate part of the damnable-domly-dom phenom is that if you’re new to topping you get the false impression that you’ve got to bluster your way through, fake it till you make it, and generally try and swagger around as if all the bullshit that gets posted about D/S in Tumblr memes were instructions and not wank-facilitators.  (”No lube” and “no safeword” and getting killed and eaten by Hannibal Lector sounds hot when you’re jilling or jacking and you’re trying to get that last bit of stimulation to get over the top.  When really, with a partner, yeah, not so much.)

My point being that the baffled-and-frustrated contingent is probably a lot higher than the unadulterated-asshole contingent.  This doesn’t excuse any such behavior.  But it does remind me there’s an awful lot of folks who need some serious mentoring. 

Bleah.

Now I’m depressed.

No, wait, I already was depressed.  The first post I saw in my Tumblr feed this morning went something like “first, daddy’s going to spank you, then I’m going to fuck your mouth till you’re begging for daddy” and sprained my eye-rolling muscles.  After reading @taylortheslut’s post I could have said “welp, that’s pretty much Bingo right there.”  

Sigh.

Why would a dom/master ever tell his sub that if he wanted to, he could “easily break her spirit” but that he doesn’t because he is a nice guy. What the fuck lol? Doesn’t sound like a dom or master to me. Sounds like an abusive thing to say. I stood up for myself and said no, I would not be anyone’s whore or have my spirit broken, and now he is implying I’m mentally ill.. Due to my reaction which was NOT friendly at all. I even did a dance about it. This sort of thing seems not okay. I’m strong.

First of all, yeah, “What the fuck” is the universal safe word. Sounds like you’re using it correctly.

I’m sure those words send some Subs and Slaves into delighted shivers. Maybe his former partner did.

But a good top… a good partner… understands that you’re not their last partner, you’re you.

And doesn’t come barreling in with silly assertions like that.

Also people who say “but I’m nice so I won’t” often aren’t and often will.

If you think he might be somehow be right about your mental health then a) block his ass and b) get a professional opinion from someone who’s not disappointed he’s not getting into your pants. Fuck him.

And if he just barged into your inbox with that line? Yeah, just block his silly ass. You may or may not be a Sub. And may or may not want a Dom. But a kink relationship is a relationship first. If you wouldn’t put up with that from a vanilla dating match you sure as hell don’t have to put up with it from a rando “Dom” from Tumblr.

Good choices. Nicely done. And thanks for letting me know.

I just blocked a Dom cause he tried to tell me to shave and he wasn’t my Dom and my goal isn’t for someone to own me. I’m just curious about your stance on this? Him and I hadn’t discussed grooming and I wasn’t under rules or anything.

willowgirl713:

onelittlekingdom:

Men shouldn’t make demands of submissives if they have not yet earned their submission, unless it is play that both parties have discussed and consented in. Just because you pop in on a submissive for a few days and call yourself a Dom, doesn’t mean you are one, or get to enjoy any of the privileges that go with earning that title. You would be within your rights to do what he asked, point out that he was getting ahead of himself, or outright deciding its a bad sign and walking away.

*No one should make demands…

A slight change to the answer to make clear that women are also capable of being shitty and domineering.

What @willowgirl713 said!  No one gets to make demands that are outside mutually agreed on boundaries.

As always, always, always, pull this back to the non-kink context.  (Remember, kink happens on top of expectation of normal behavior, not instead of normal expectations.)

So it would be weird if this guy tried to tell you to give him your bank account info or car keys, right?  Right.  Even if you’d been on a couple of dates with him, right?  Right!

And as the anon said, he might be a “dom” (though I’m skeptical) but he’s not her Dom.  Even though it sounds like they might have been been on the Tumblr equivalent of a couple of “dates.”  

No matter how Submissive or Little or Masochistic you are, just keep asking yourself what would you say if a neighbor tried to get you to do A Thing (like shaving.)  What would you say if it was a barista at your local coffee shop, or a personal trainer, or a get-out-the-vote doorbeller?  

The very least you’d do is block them, right!  And no one would be surprised if you told them off.  Point is that being a Sub doesn’t open you up to anything that being a sheetmetal worker doesn’t open you up to.

And to forestall a bunch of “yeah, but’s,” sure a cop can certainly tell you to go back another way at a blocked intersection, but she still can’t tell you to shave, right? Right.

It’s not about kink, it’s about civility.

(Note: “foid” is evidently incel-speak for “feminoids” or, you know, women.)

I’m gonna say this with all the love and care and generosity in my big, soft heart, but incels would be a lot happier if they got over their social indoctrination that they’re heterosexual. Or sexual, period.

Abstinence has historically been an easy out for closeted asexuals. Misogyny and misandry has historically been protective coloration for gay and Lesbian self-deniers.

It might have made sense in places where intolerance was through the roof and, say, lynching and burning at the stake were common consequences. But it’s heartbreaking to see so many young men trying desperately to reconcile their heteronormative indoctrination with their authentic needs.

Pity isn’t the same thing as excusing. Their grievous misunderstanding makes them very dangerous men. But it’s still ok to wish they’d just look a little deeper and realize they’re not straight or they’re entirely non-sexual.

For the (historical) record, on my old, original blog I spent a lot of time heaping scorn and verbal abuse on the huge array of “sociobiology,” it’s allegedly more fact-based bastard child “evolutionary psychology,” and the various trolls, MRAs and incels who devour it like flies on shit.

The basic thrust of all these “disciplines” builds down to, basically, explaining why creepers can’t get dates. Usually, the theory always goes, women are feckless gold diggers with strong preferences for racist bugaboos.

My counteragument was always that historically, in, you know, actual capital-P Patriarchy all “sexual selection” took place between… heads of households cutting deals with other heads of households using marriage of offspring and vassals as tokens of exchange.

The studies aggregated in the link above backs up my (fairly well-informed) intuition with academic vigor.

Clue: in 200 “hunter gatherer” societies the average age of marriage for men is roughly age 21. And berate age for “women” girls? 14!🤮

And one of the key determinants for the man’s “reproductive success? marriage selection? His affinity or utility to… the “bride’s” father.

Not a lot of room there for sociobiology’s fetishization of ovulation, semen consumption, preferences for “alph” males or scorn for “betas,” women’s oddity of coming from straight vanilla intercourse, etc.

Glad to see it all laid it more clearly than I ever felt I was able to.

Also fuck that shit. Give me a decent society where women can be CEOs, authors, and scientists instead of getting sidelined as self-cleaning cock sleeves. Update: because if nothing else that kind of society give me, and us, far more, and vastly hotter sex than 10,000 knee-squeezing “alpha male” wannabes and their generally pinched and transaction-oriented Patriarchal ideals could possibly imagine.

(Hint: you think women aren’t interested in stoop-chested MRAs, good luck imagining they’d do better sucking up to theirl fathers back I. The “good old days.” Because ahahahah, yeah, no.

Hi Mr. Instructor, I’m having some trouble being little right now after a friend, who introduced me to the life, told me I was a bad sub because I’m a paramedic and an E.R. Physician Assistant. He said that because both of my jobs require me to be in charge and in control means I’m not a real submissive. I’m just a little stuck right now. My personality has always been what I now know as “little” but now idk what to do. Any advice?

elexania:

sincardinality:

Does this friend think that submissive men can’t be managers or CEOs? Because I know that’s very much a thing.

I’m very much what is referred to commonly as an “alpha submissive”. I am a strong ass, independent, intelligent woman who handles her shit. I work in a male dominated industry, where I have to be better because if not, I wouldn’t be respected. Between customers not trusting the information I give them because I lack a penis, or from the sales reps, distributors and accounts people I deal with daily, I need to be on my game. I have earned respect, and am sought out for my expertise and assistance by my compatriots in my industry now. But when I am not handling my business, there is nothing I crave more than crawling into Daddy’s lap and being smol. I do not age regress (at least not in the way that is generally thought of), but that safe place and the vulnerability his presence allows is necessary and allows me to be in the place I need. Do NOT let some clueless asshat take away your identity, or tell you how you fail or aren’t a true submissive. Be you, be smol, go into your little space and embrace and love it. Just also be proud of your badass, business handling self 💗

I’m not a giant fan of the word “alpha submissive” for reasons the very assertive Submissive Elia Winters nicely articulated in her blog a few years ago

instructor144:

Whoever told you that is a fucking idiot who doesn’t understand what being a submissive means. Here’s a copy/paste from the vault of something I wrote ages ago that encapsulates it:

“I know submissives who wear jeans and t shirts and sneakers, who are bookworms, gamer chicks, RPG players, and programmer nerds. I know submissives who would break an ankle in short order if they tried to wear heels, and who would sooner be put on denial for a year than wear a dress. Submissives who rappel out of helicopters into fire, who run hundred milers, who squat more than their bodyweight, who box and MMA. Submissives who are EMS personnel, warfighters, police officers, trauma unit nurses, doctors, lawyers, ranchers, up and coming businesswomen, entrepreneurs, carpenters. In short, they are real, live human beings, just like you, and all are amazing submissives.”

The term “alpha sub” presumes that there is a default correlation between a person’s role in consensual power exchange – Dominant or submissive – and that person’s life outside of the bedroom. The term assumes that most sexual submissives are submissive all the time, so the ones who aren’t need a special term to define them. If you don’t identify as an alpha sub, you must just be a pushover. The fact that the term is used to define female subs rather than male subs speaks to another prejudice, that female subs are more likely to be “naturally submissive” all the time and therefore need a special term to define the “outliers” who, of course, aren’t really outliers at all. While well-intentioned, it’s another term that separates us and puts us in imaginary competition with each other. “Oh, I’m better than other subs. I’m an alpha sub.”
Elia Winters

Point being that not all Submissives are kick-ass power-suiters… any more than Doms are for that matter.  Submissive is a kink not a class and definitely not a status.

That said?  Oh my fucking god I strive to be mild mannered, and I was raised to be and work hard at it.  But as the Quaker said when his cow kicked him and the milk bucket “nay, Bossie, I won’t strike thee… but on the morrow I’ll trade thee to the Baptist and he’ll beat the hell out of you.”

Whoever “advised” @instructor144′s Anon that you can’t be a Sub or (hackles definitely rising cause this is my turf!) can’t be a Little if you’re a competent, capable professional-caregiver adult!  Because just like you don’t have to be an “alpha” to be a Sub you sure as hell can be!  Fuck him and the horse he rode up on for spouting that kind of bullshit!

Others have already given the anon wonderful advice so I’m not preaching to the choir here – that sermon’s done said.

But (to continue my unexpected theological metaphor) I’d like to send the rest of you out in the world to spread the good word: kink in general and D/Lg in particular is not about age, or gender, or who’s on top, or who sucks what, or orientation, or whether you’re a dom or a sub, or whether you’re a brat or doormat, or occupation or education level.  It’s not about weight or height or experience level.  And oh dear god but it’s not about status or class!

You can be a Little if that’s what makes your heart beat a little faster, if that’s what feels like coming home, and it’s only extra credit if that’s what makes you hard or wet too – there are plenty of non-sexual Littles.  You can be a Little if that’s what makes you feel happy.  Or, if you’re usually gloomy, if that at least makes you happier.  And that’s it.  That’s all!  There are no other rules.

Honestly, what goes through people’s heads when they say shit like that to newcomers?  And as a Daddy, who’d say a thing like that to a beginning Little!!!

Ugh!!!  

Look.  To shift religions slightly, we’re all born with a bag of shit around our necks; our purpose in life is to take as much shit out of our bag as we’re able… without put it into anyone else’s bag.  And somebody dropped a fresh, stinky turd in that poor anon’s.

how do you recognize being a traditional submissive with being a feminist”? i struggle a lot reading texts talking about being a “good traditional girl for him” but also it’s what feels right in the moment??

wild-rosebuds:

MOOD

I’m new to reading “tradfem” blogs and I find some of them completely at odds with myself and my values. I try to ignore those ones and only seek out what feels good and right to me. I love the traditional aesthetic, and I love some of the aspects of the values, but I’m happy to pick and choose what I’ll take or leave. Same thing with kink blogs.

I would never be okay with a world based on traditional gender roles. From my studies and lived experiences I know that gender roles are socially constructed – not biological – and that they cause more harm than good. Ideally, everyone should be able to express their gender the way that makes sense to them.

I also have a kink for submission and forced femininity. That isn’t at odds with my values, because it happens only between consenting partners in a kink setting. I love cooking and dressing up and cleaning for my Sir, but I would never accept a vanilla boyfriend expecting me to do housework for him because he thinks it’s my job. Sir and I have an understanding that our dynamic is negotiated (we have a contract and everything) and that the sexism we roleplay is play, not reality. He enjoys the role of the dominant controlling man, but he also knows that when he needs it I can step out of my role as subservient little girl and can give him advice, or criticize him, or do whatever. It’s all about communication and trust.

Feminism is the fight for the liberation of all people from patriarchy. When I’m having fun with my loving boyfriend roleplaying something that gets us both off, and I know that throughout the whole experience he respects me as an equal and won’t take advantage of my vulnerability, I don’t think I’m straying too far from that fight. I wouldn’t say kink is feminist, especially straight bdsm with a man as the dom and woman as the sub, but I don’t think it’s necessarily always anti-feminist

Thanks for bearing with the long response!

THE key difference between D/S Submission or being a D/Lg Little, or being into humiliation play, having a forced into “traditional” femininity or other, similar kinks and actual, real misogynistic “traditional femininity,” abuse, and discrimination is…

Whether that shit follows you when you walk out of the bedroom door.  And the front door.  And your office, workplace, or church door.  Or just walking down the goddamn street.

I mentioned earlier today (or meant to, or it could be in my queue) that pretty much all the people who like their asshole touched when they’re about to come have exactly zero interest whatsoever in having their asshole touched when they’re crunching to submit form R-377 to the head office under deadline.

It’s the same with any kind of traditional gender roles.  Hot in bed, if it makes you wet and/or hard.  Decidedly not anywhere else.

The other comparison: it’s hot playing cop/prisoner games with handcuffs with your sweetie in the bedroom, it’s straight-up non-sexy hell in the back of a police cruiser on the way to jail.

Use the fortune-cookie game rules: It’s just a kink of you only mean “…in bed.”

Because it’s intoxicating. Because we want to drown in your juices and scent. Because we want to feel you lose control and grind on us as the unleashed needy girl we made you. Because we can grab you by the hips and force another orgasm. Because it makes our dick hard. Because it’s what you’re told do. Because it’s MY pussy to eat any way I want to. Now get up there and RIDE!

instructor144:

What Anon said.

And a big hat’s off to @instructor144 for handling the equally stupid “how can you let a Sub be on top” at the end.

Good rule of thumb here, boys and girls: long as it’s between two competent, consenting adults it’s a damn bad idea to tell a Dom, Daddy, or other power-exchange top what they can or can not do. isn’t it?  Got that?  Repeat it!  Louder!  Alright now go sit back down.

You eat pussy/ass? How that can be a Dom thing?

theimperfetc:

What in the bluest of all blue hells…

Do you know how to eat pussy/ass? When you do it properly, you pull the soul out of her body and keep it in your possession until the desperate little thing strives to be good enough to deserve it again. It doesn’t get much more Dom than that.

Ahahahahaha!  Big hats off to @theimperfetc! 

That anon’s poor partner!  Or possibly the anon, because a rather surprising number of women Subs go cold when a top does something they see as “weak.”  But either way…

Ahahahah!  Yeah, how can eating pussy or ass be “a Dom thing?”

Angel, baby, pumpkin pie there’s nothing more Dominant than reducing you to the point where the tip of my tongue has what’s left of your mind floating three states away while your helpless little body stays behind, panting and gurgling and hips held down in a strong man’s grip while shaking like an off-balance washer trying to spin.

You don’t get that then you seriously don’t get topping.  You can’t even do that then you need to go back to school, son.  You’re not able to enjoy putting someone there you have no idea what you’re missing!

Nothing wrong with not wanting to eat your sweetie any more than her not wanting to suck your dick.  Same with not wanting someone to go down on you.  But don’t be an asshole about it and claim “Doms don’t do that.”  Cause bullshit we can and do.

(Next thing you’ll be saying Subs can’t be on top, and ahahaha, oh yeah you can.)